Consensus statement on standards for neurocritical care units in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs)

dc.citation.epage8
dc.citation.issue2026
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.volume91
dc.contributor.authorGentle S. Shrestha
dc.contributor.authorHemanshu Prabhakar
dc.contributor.authorCharu Mahajan
dc.contributor.authorIndu Kapoor
dc.contributor.authorSarah L. Livesay
dc.contributor.authorVenkatkrishna Rajajee
dc.contributor.authorKapil Zirpe
dc.contributor.authorWalter Videtta
dc.contributor.authorSusmita Gisele Sampaio Silva
dc.contributor.authorSamuel Ern Hung Tsan
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-05T06:21:39Z
dc.date.issued2026-02
dc.description.abstractThe disease burden of severe neurological and neurosurgical illnesses in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is high. Management of these patients by a dedicated neurocritical care team can improve outcome. Globally, there is significant variation in organization, structure, and outcome of patients with neurocritical illnesses. This consensus statement aims to contextualize the standards for neurological critical care units (NCCUs) in LMICs. Recommendations were made about organization and infrastructure, personnel, logistics, training, education, and process for developing neurocritical care program appropriate for LMICs. Methods: The steering committee for the consensus statement was formed under the leadership of Society of Neurocritical Care (SNCC), India. With permission from Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) and the NCS guidelines committee, the previously published standards for NCCUs by NCS was used for a web-based survey. The Delphi method was used to gather consensus. A total of 28 experts from 21 nations, all from LMICs, participated in the Delphi. Responses were formally collated, reviewed, and incorporated into the final document. For Level 1 NCCUs, we found that LMIC experts have recommended few parameters that were considered optional by NCS. However, for Level 2 and 3 ICUs, many recommendations from NCS were suggested to be considered as optional by LMIC experts. We have made attempts to explain the variation in recommendations. The recommendations should be tested for feasibility at the local settings before implementing them.
dc.description.referencesUncontrolled Keywords : Quality indicator, Standards, Neurocritical care, Low-income countries, Middle-income countries, Resource limited settings.
dc.description.statusPublished
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155296
dc.identifier.emailtehsamuel@unimas.my
dc.identifier.issn0883-9441
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125002837
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.unimas.my/handle/123456789/126
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Critical Care
dc.titleConsensus statement on standards for neurocritical care units in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs)
dc.typeArticles
dc.type.statusYes

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shresta 2025.pdf
Size:
1.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections