Waste-to-hydrogen pathways: A cross-sectoral review of feedstock potentials, process integration, and sustainability metrics
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Abstract
Biohydrogen production from waste offers a dual solution to mounting waste management pressures and fossil fuel dependence. This review addresses the gap through a cross-sectoral analysis of waste categories: agricultural residues, municipal solid waste, and wastewater, synthesised across classification tables and a review on a comparative framework encompassing hydrogen yield, energy output, environmental impact, economic feasibility, technology readiness, grid integration potential, scalability, and regional relevance. Dark fermentation of sugar-rich agro-industrial wastes achieves the highest near-term viability, with pineapple peel juice yielding up to 2.3 mol H2/mol sugar and POME reaching 1.88 mol H2/mol sugar under thermophilic conditions, both requiring minimal pretreatment. However, Technology Readiness Level mapping reveals that no reviewed pathway has surpassed TRL 7, and the levelized cost of biohydrogen spans $2.50–48.96/kg H2, with pathway selection, not feedstock alone, as the primary cost driver. Life cycle assessment integration remains critically
absent from most studies, motivating the standardised cradle-to-grave LCA–TEA framework proposed herein. The review aligns these findings with Malaysia's National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR), Sarawak Hydrogen Economy Roadmap (SHER), and Post-COVID Development Strategy (PCDS) 2030, identifying waste-to-biohydrogen as a priority deployment pathway for the circular bioeconomy.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Henry, A. C., Atan, M. F., Asrul, M. A. M., Lai, J. C. H., Salleh, S. F., Wahi, R., Yun, H. A. H., Tan, I. A. W., Mulok, F. L. M., & Abdullah, R. (2026). Waste-to-hydrogen pathways: A cross-sectoral review of feedstock potentials, process integration, and sustainability metrics. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 269(2026), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.157112
