Rewarding leadership: CEO compensation and growth outcomes in agricultural industry

dc.citation.epage12
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.volume9
dc.contributor.authorMohd Waliuddin Mohd Razal
dc.contributor.authorNur Hazwanie Jamaliyah Jama
dc.contributor.authorDg Junaidah Awang Jambol
dc.contributor.authorRozaiha Ab Majid
dc.contributor.authorRossazana Ab Rahim
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Economics and Business
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-03T04:07:04Z
dc.date.issued2026-08
dc.description.abstractPerformance-based CEO pay is becoming more popular as a way to align executive incentives with business growth. However, the research results are still not consistent, especially in emerging markets such as Malaysia. In some cases, CEOs continue to receive high compensation even when companies perform poorly, and many companies provide limited disclosure of executive pay. This raises concerns about whether CEO compensation truly supports sustainable company growth. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between chief executive officer (CEO) compensation and company growth among Malaysian public listed companies. A sample of 25 companies in the agricultural industry from 2021–2023 was selected. All financial data were collected from Orblis and companies’ annual reports. Fixed effects panel regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between the dependent and independent variables and control variables. The results reveal a significant positive relationship between CEO compensation and company growth. Well-structured and performance-based CEO compensation aligns management and shareholder interests, supporting both agency theory and human capabilities theory by enhancing leadership effectiveness and company growth. It further underscores the need for strong governance, transparent disclosure, and independent compensation committees while also signaling to shareholders and investors that executive pay design reflects governance quality and long-term value creation. All the control variables, such as company size, liquidity and company age, are positively related to company growth, whereas leverage is negatively related to company growth. Future research should involve a larger sample across different industries and longer time periods while also considering CEO compensation components, executive characteristics, governance factors, and external conditions to better explain company growth.
dc.description.referencesUncontrolled Keywords: executive remuneration, company performance, agency theory, plantation sector, corporate governance.
dc.description.statusPublished
dc.identifier.citationMohd Razali, M. W., Jamal, N. H. J., Jambol, D. J. A., Ab Majid, R., & Ab Rahim, R. (2026). Rewarding leadership: CEO compensation and growth outcomes in agricultural industry. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(2), 2027161. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2027161
dc.identifier.doihttps://10.31893/multiscience.2027161
dc.identifier.emailmrmwaliuddin@unimas.my
dc.identifier.emailarrossazana@unimas.my
dc.identifier.issn2675-1240
dc.identifier.urihttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/msj/article/view/15783
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.unimas.my/handle/123456789/1371
dc.publisherMalque Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofMultidisciplinary Science Journal
dc.titleRewarding leadership: CEO compensation and growth outcomes in agricultural industry
dc.typeArticles
dc.type.statusYes

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rewarding leadership.pdf
Size:
579.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections